Embedding Mediation in Contract Management for Business Leaders

11 August 2025

Using Commercial Mediation for Better Contract Management

Contracts are the lifeblood of modern commerce. They provide the framework within which organisations cooperate, allocate risks, and define expectations. Yet even the most carefully drafted agreement cannot foresee every eventuality. Business leaders know that differences in interpretation, changes in commercial priorities, and unforeseen market pressures can all generate tensions within contractual relationships. Left unmanaged, these tensions can escalate into costly disputes that consume management time, damage business relationships, and undermine commercial performance.


For many senior executives, traditional dispute resolution routes such as litigation and arbitration appear too slow, too expensive, and too adversarial to serve the needs of modern businesses. Increasingly, organisations are asking how they can embed mediation into their approach to contract management so that disagreements are addressed early, constructively, and with a focus on preserving value rather than destroying it.



The case for embedding mediation into contract management

Embedding mediation within contract management is not simply about providing a fall back when relationships deteriorate. It is about designing a culture and a process that anticipates conflict, recognises its inevitability, and channels it towards constructive dialogue.

Mediation offers several advantages to business leaders seeking to improve contract performance:


  1. Preservation of relationships: Unlike litigation, which is inherently adversarial, mediation is collaborative. It allows parties to explore solutions that protect the underlying commercial relationship, which may be more valuable than the contract itself.
  2. Speed and efficiency: Mediation can be convened quickly and often resolves disputes in days rather than months or years. This allows businesses to refocus on their commercial objectives rather than prolonged battles.
  3. Confidentiality: Mediation is private and confidential, which is essential when disputes involve sensitive financial, strategic, or reputational issues.
  4. Commercial flexibility: Unlike court judgments, mediated settlements can include creative and flexible solutions such as renegotiated performance obligations, revised pricing structures, or new collaborative ventures.


For senior leaders, these benefits translate into reduced costs, better use of management time, and more resilient partnerships.



Mediation clauses in contracts

One of the most direct ways to embed mediation into contract management is through the inclusion of mediation clauses in commercial agreements. These clauses commit parties to attempt mediation before resorting to litigation or arbitration.


While some executives worry that such clauses may delay access to formal legal remedies, the evidence suggests otherwise. Properly drafted mediation clauses provide a structured first step that does not remove the right to litigate but ensures that parties pause to attempt resolution.


An effective mediation clause should:

  • Clearly state the requirement to mediate before initiating proceedings.
  • Specify the mediation body or rules to be followed, such as those of CEDR or another recognised provider.
  • Provide a timeframe within which mediation should take place.
  • Confirm that if mediation does not succeed, parties remain free to pursue arbitration or litigation.


By incorporating such clauses as a standard feature in their contracts, businesses signal a commitment to resolving disputes constructively and demonstrate a forward looking approach to risk management.



Building mediation into contract management processes

Embedding mediation is not simply about inserting clauses. It also requires aligning internal processes and governance structures with a proactive approach to dispute resolution. Business leaders should consider the following practical measures:


1. Early identification of tensions

Contracts rarely unravel overnight. More often, performance issues build gradually, with missed deadlines, disputed invoices, or shifting expectations creating friction. Establishing regular review meetings and clear reporting lines helps identify concerns before they escalate. Mediation works best when it is introduced early, and a culture of openness allows organisations to engage with mediators before positions harden.


2. Training contract managers and in-house counsel

Those who manage contractual relationships on a daily basis are often the first to detect signs of trouble. Training them to recognise conflict dynamics and to understand when mediation may be appropriate equips them with the tools to de escalate situations quickly. In-house lawyers also benefit from understanding mediation not just as an alternative to litigation but as a complementary element of contract performance management.


3. Appointing mediators proactively

Some organisations have gone further by appointing standing panels of mediators who can be engaged at short notice. This approach, sometimes referred to as dispute boards or standing neutral arrangements, ensures that expertise is available immediately. Having an identified mediator familiar with the contract and the relationship reduces delays and builds confidence in the process.


4. Integrating mediation into corporate governance

For larger organisations, embedding mediation may involve updating governance policies to require board-level oversight of major disputes and to mandate mediation as a first step. This ensures that the use of mediation is not dependent on individual managers but is a systemic feature of how the business approaches risk.



Mediation as a tool for business leadership

From a leadership perspective, mediation is not merely a technical process but a statement about how the organisation values relationships, approaches risk, and models problem-solving. Business leaders who embrace mediation demonstrate to their stakeholders that they are focused on outcomes, efficiency, and integrity.


Consider a multinational joint venture where cultural differences, differing regulatory regimes, and fluctuating market conditions threaten to undermine performance. Litigation across multiple jurisdictions would be ruinously expensive and slow. Mediation provides a confidential space in which the parties can renegotiate commitments, clarify expectations, and find solutions that sustain the venture. By embedding mediation into the contract from the outset, the parties have an agreed mechanism for managing these inevitable challenges.


Similarly, in supply chain disputes, where late deliveries or quality issues can quickly escalate, mediation allows the parties to resolve matters without severing the commercial link. For businesses that rely on strategic suppliers, preserving continuity can be far more valuable than securing damages through litigation.



Addressing common concerns

Some business leaders remain cautious about mediation, perceiving it as a sign of weakness or a distraction from asserting contractual rights. These concerns are understandable but often misplaced.


Mediation does not require concession. It requires dialogue. Parties remain free to enforce their rights if mediation does not succeed. What mediation does provide is an opportunity to resolve matters on terms that litigation can rarely deliver.


Another concern is that mediation may be inappropriate where legal principles or precedent are at stake. This may be true in a minority of cases, but most commercial disputes are not about creating precedent. They are about finding workable solutions to practical problems. In these situations, mediation is a better fit for business objectives.



Conclusion: Mediation as a strategic advantage

For today’s business leaders, contract management is no longer just about compliance and enforcement. It is about building resilient relationships that deliver value over time. Embedding mediation into contracts and management processes equips organisations with a powerful tool to manage risk, reduce costs, and sustain partnerships.


The question is not whether disputes will arise. They will. The real question is how your organisation will respond when they do. Those who embed mediation into their contracts and governance structures are better placed to protect relationships, safeguard commercial value, and lead with confidence.


At Tregaskis Mediation, we work with organisations to design mediation strategies that align with business objectives and contract management frameworks. By embedding mediation into the heart of commercial practice, senior leaders can turn potential conflict into an opportunity for constructive dialogue and long-term success.

Faster Commercial Dispute Resolution with Business Mediation. Tregaskis Mediation
15 September 2025
Embracing Mediation to Speed Up Resolution of your Commercial Disputes
Commercial Negotiation. Tregaskis Mediation
14 July 2025
Understanding Mediation: Your Secret Tool in Business Negotiations
24 June 2025
Early Termination of a Major Infrastructure Project: How Mediation Resolves High-Stakes Cross-Border Disputes  The construction and infrastructure sectors often face complex disputes that can halt progress or threaten relationships. When these disagreements involve multiple countries, legal systems, and cultural nuances, resolving them efficiently becomes even more challenging. This is where commercial mediation plays a vital role, offering a pragmatic and cost-effective path to resolution. One standout example is a high-stakes dispute concerning the early termination of a tunnelling contract in London. The case, led by Gordon Tregaskis, exemplifies how expert mediation can bridge cultural gaps, facilitate negotiation, and deliver results where traditional litigation or arbitration might falter. Here's the full story of how this dispute unfolded – and how mediation proved to be the ultimate key to resolution. The Case at a Glance The disagreement involved two parties from vastly different backgrounds – one Thai and the other British – over the early termination of a multi-million-pound tunnelling contract. The Claimants initially sought damages of £30 million, while the British respondents refuted the claims, countering with an offer that covered only their legal costs for arbitration at £1 million. With such polarised positions, finding common ground seemed almost impossible. The mediation began with high hopes but reached a deadlock on the first day, with neither party willing to budge. However, through strategic communication and a commitment to collaboration, Gordon was able to steer the parties toward a settlement of £2.89 million within ten days. This case is a valuable case study demonstrating the nuances of effective mediation. Overcoming the Challenges of Cross-Border Disputes Cross-border disputes like this one come with a unique set of challenges. Differences in legal frameworks, business practices, cultural values, and even negotiation styles can quickly derail discussions. Mediation provides a neutral and adaptable platform to bridge these differences, fostering understanding and cooperation. Navigating Cultural Sensitivities One of the fundamental barriers in international disputes is cultural disparity. It’s not just about language differences—it’s about nuanced negotiation behaviours, expectations, and communication styles. Thai negotiation styles, for instance, often favour non-confrontational approaches, whereas British counterparts may adopt a more direct way of addressing issues. Gordon’s experience in cross-cultural mediation was instrumental in this case. Rather than letting misunderstandings deepen the divide, he provided a neutral space where both sides felt heard and respected. His ability to mediate culturally sensitive discussions enabled the parties to focus on the facts without letting personal or cultural differences cloud their judgment. Aligning International Legal Perspectives Another significant challenge lay in harmonising the legal frameworks of the two jurisdictions involved. Thai and British legal systems differ greatly in terms of contract law and dispute resolution methods. For lawyers and professionals representing parties in such situations, mediation offers a valuable alternative to being locked into a single legal framework. Gordon’s ability to draw upon his extensive legal knowledge and explain each side’s perspectives in plain language was crucial in fostering mutual understanding. The Power of Strategic Communication While mediation itself is inherently strategic, Gordon’s approach in this case set a benchmark for effective communication practices. The first day of the mediation saw both parties maintaining rigid positions, with no willingness to compromise. However, Gordon recognised the need for ongoing dialogue beyond the mediation room. Continuing the Negotiation Beyond One Day One major advantage of mediation, as opposed to traditional litigation, is its flexibility. When the first round of negotiations ended in a stalemate, Gordon suggested implementing an ongoing communication strategy. Over the course of ten days, the two parties engaged in regular phone calls, orchestrated by Gordon, focusing on smaller aspects of the dispute. This persistence paid off. With each call, trust began to build, and the parties gradually moved towards the middle ground. By keeping the lines of communication open, a rigid gridlock evolved into a meaningful dialogue—a critical step that eventually led to resolution. Focusing on Common Ground Throughout the discussions, Gordon adeptly guided the conversations toward areas of mutual agreement. This approach helped the two parties recognise potential solutions instead of fixating solely on their differences. For businesses and legal professionals involved in mediation, this is a key takeaway. Finding shared goals or values—such as minimising public exposure of the conflict or avoiding drawn-out legal proceedings—can be the first step towards resolution. Cost-Effectiveness in Commercial Mediation For businesses embroiled in disputes of this magnitude, cost is an understandable concern. While litigation and arbitration are reliable legal avenues, they often come with significant expense, time commitments, and uncertainty. Mediation presents an appealing alternative that reduces these burdens. Avoiding Prolonged Legal Proceedings Had this case gone to arbitration, both parties would have incurred substantial costs in terms of legal fees, expert witnesses, and procedural delays. Gordon’s mediation efforts led to a resolution in just ten days. For professionals in legal and business sectors, this highlights one of mediation’s most significant advantages—efficiency. Preservation of Relationships Another advantage of mediation lies in its collaborative nature. Unlike litigation, which often pits parties against one another in a winner-takes-all scenario, mediation encourages both sides to work together towards an outcome that satisfies everyone’s interests. This case concluded with both parties accepting the £2.89 million settlement, avoiding the long-term damage to business relationships that often results from contentious legal battles. Key Lessons for Legal Professionals and Businesses The success of this mediation holds valuable lessons for legal professionals and businesses in the UK who are looking to resolve disputes more efficiently: Invest in Skilled Mediators - Having a seasoned mediator like Gordon Tregaskis can make all the difference. His deep understanding of cross-cultural dynamics and strategic negotiation techniques shifted the case from an impasse to resolution. Leverage Mediation for Cross-Border Disputes - For disputes involving international parties, mediation offers a flexible and neutral framework that eliminates many of the jurisdictional challenges posed by litigation. Adopt Strategic Communication - Open and ongoing dialogue, even outside the confines of mediation sessions, can lay the groundwork for meaningful compromises. Keeping the channels of communication open was pivotal in this case. Focus on Cost-Effective Outcomes - Mediation not only saves time and costs but also protects reputations and preserves relationships, making it a worthwhile alternative to adversarial legal processes. Closing Thoughts The case of the early termination of a major infrastructure project demonstrates the value of commercial mediation in resolving complex cross-border disputes. For legal professionals and business leaders in the UK, mediation offers a smarter way forward—one that prioritises efficiency, relationship preservation, and long-term benefits over protracted courtroom battles. Gordon Tregaskis’s approach to this case underscores why he is trusted by clients worldwide to handle high-stakes commercial disputes. From understanding cultural nuances to managing communication strategies, his expertise exemplifies the hallmarks of effective mediation. For businesses and solicitors facing their own challenges, choosing mediation could be the difference between costly litigation and a resolution that works for all parties. Please contact Gordon if you need assistance with your dispute.
Construction Dispute - Tregaskis Mediation
2 June 2025
Learn expert strategies for resolving construction disputes, from clear contracts to mediation. Protect your projects and manage conflicts effectively.
19 May 2025
Using Mediation to Avoid Further Disruption to This Middle East Project
More posts